Ever since Bitcoin burst onto the scene, there's been a lot of talk – and often, confusion – about what it's really for. You've probably heard the question: "Can I buy a coffee with Bitcoin?" It's a common way to gauge its usefulness, but it might be missing the bigger picture.
Many people, especially early critics, have framed Bitcoin as a direct competitor to everyday money like the U.S. dollar, which is used for small, daily purchases. This naturally leads to critiques about Bitcoin's transaction speed and fees, especially when you stack it up against giants like Visa or Mastercard. While these comparisons are understandable, especially given Bitcoin's "electronic cash" label, they might overlook a more profound purpose baked into its design.
The truth is, Bitcoin, as envisioned by its mysterious creator Satoshi Nakamoto and shown by its very architecture, is much better suited as a peer-to-peer system for moving significant amounts of value directly between people and as a rock-solid settlement layer. It's not primarily designed to be the go-to currency for your daily grocery run, replacing the dollar in every wallet. Because of this, its transaction capacity, while always a hot topic, might actually be just fine for what it does best. Bitcoin's real magic lies in its power to let people send value securely and without anyone's permission, cutting out the traditional financial middlemen.
So, let's dig into what Bitcoin is truly about. We'll look at Satoshi's original vision, compare Bitcoin to the dollar, see why it shines for big-money transfers, tackle the "scalability" question, explore the problems in old-school finance that Bitcoin aims to fix, and see how it stacks up against gold.
Unpacking "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System": What Did Satoshi Really Mean?
The document that started it all, published on Halloween 2008 by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto, was titled "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." This nine-page paper, first shared on a cryptography mailing list, laid out the blueprint for a new kind of electronic money that didn't need banks. That "Peer-to-Peer" part wasn't just fluff; it's key to understanding Bitcoin. It means the system is built for direct dealings, cutting out the usual go-betweens.
What "Peer-to-Peer" Means for Bitcoin
In Bitcoin's world, "Peer-to-Peer" (P2P) means transactions happen directly between two parties without a central authority or bank stepping in. The Bitcoin white paper aimed to let people deal directly with each other online, ditching the trust-based model of traditional digital payments that lean on third-party providers.
Think about buying groceries with a debit card. It feels direct, but behind the scenes, it's a party: your bank, a payment processor (like Visa), the store's bank, and maybe others. Bitcoin's P2P nature is about the how of the transfer – direct, on its own network, no traditional middleman needed – rather than strictly who is involved. A business can be a "peer" if it directly accepts Bitcoin. The focus is on cutting out intermediaries. The "peers" are simply the sender and receiver on the Bitcoin network.
The Trouble with Traditional Commerce, According to Nakamoto
- The Trust-Based Model: Online commerce had become almost completely dependent on these third parties. While it works most of the time, it has the weaknesses of any system built on trust.
- Transaction Costs: Middlemen mean extra costs, often through fees or built-in charges for their services. These costs make tiny transactions impractical.
- Reversibility vs. Irreversibility: Traditional systems let transactions be reversed. This protects consumers but costs merchants who have to deal with fraud. The need to handle disputes adds more cost. Bitcoin was designed for non-reversible transactions for non-reversible services, which could shield sellers from fraud and reduce the need for trust.
- Privacy Worries: The old way forces users to share a lot of personal info with third parties. Privacy was a big motivator for Bitcoin, aiming for secure transactions without users having to spill their personal data to middlemen.
The "Electronic Cash" Part
The whitepaper wanted to create a "digital representation of hard cash." This "electronic cash" was meant to have cash-like features: it's a bearer instrument, it settles directly between parties, and it offers some privacy.
The "cash" in "Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" brings to mind the finality and directness of physical cash, especially when used to settle big debts. When a large sum is paid in physical cash, the deal is usually instant and can't be undone between the parties. Bitcoin's design for non-reversible transactions fits this "hard cash" idea. In contrast, small everyday payments through traditional channels often have consumer protections that allow relatively easy reversals. This is very different from how physical cash works for settlement and from Bitcoin's "electronic cash" design. So, the "cash" Satoshi Nakamoto imagined seems more like the robust, settlement-style cash used for definite value transfer, not just digital pocket change for quick, small buys.
Bitcoin vs. The Dollar: Different Tools for Different Jobs
The U.S. dollar is the king of the American economy and the world's main reserve currency. It's a jack-of-all-trades: a widely accepted way to pay for things, a way to price goods, and a store of value (at least compared to other fiat currencies, though inflation can chip away at its buying power). The Federal Reserve, a central authority, manages the dollar's supply and monetary policy. This central control allows for economic interventions but also ties the currency's stability to the institution's decisions and credibility.
Bitcoin is a whole different beast:
- Decentralized vs. Centralized: Unlike the centrally managed dollar, Bitcoin runs on a decentralized network kept alive by a global group of miners and node operators. No single entity controls Bitcoin or how it's made.
- Fixed Supply vs. Elastic Supply: Bitcoin has a mathematically set and capped supply of 21 million coins. This is a stark contrast to the dollar's flexible supply, which the Fed can change. This fixed supply is a core part of Bitcoin's design, meant to prevent the money supply from being inflated at will.
- Primary Use Case Focus: The dollar is built for widespread, fast, and usually low-cost (for the user at the point of sale) transactions of all sizes. Bitcoin prioritizes secure, censorship-resistant, peer-to-peer value transfer. These features are most valuable for large sums, cross-border deals, or when trust in middlemen is low or unwanted.
Why Bitcoin Isn't Meant to Replace All Dollar Functions
Several of Bitcoin's built-in features make it less ideal as a direct, do-everything replacement for the U.S. dollar in everyday shopping:
- Volatility: Bitcoin's price, when measured against fiat currencies like the dollar, has historically been very up-and-down. This price instability makes it tough for businesses to price things in Bitcoin and for people to use it for daily purchases where price certainty is key.
- Transaction Throughput (Base Layer): Bitcoin's main blockchain layer isn't designed to handle the massive number of transactions that global retail payment systems process.
- User Experience for Microtransactions: For small, everyday payments, Bitcoin's transaction fees (which can change with network traffic) and confirmation times (needed for security) can feel too high or inconvenient compared to near-instant, often seemingly fee-less (to the consumer) card payments.
To see these differences more clearly, here's a comparison of Bitcoin's base layer with traditional retail payment systems like Visa, which use currencies like the U.S. dollar.
Feature | Bitcoin (Base Layer) | Traditional Retail Payment Rails (e.g. Dollar/Visa) |
|---|---|---|
| Typical Transaction Value | High (average over $5,000) | Low to Mixed (average around $80 for Visa) |
| Transaction Speed | Minutes to ~1 Hour for strong finality | Seconds for Authorization |
| Transaction Cost | Independent of value; variable based on network demand | Often % of value or fixed fee, absorbed by merchant |
| Finality | High/Practically Irreversible after confirmations | Reversible (chargebacks possible) |
| Intermediary Reliance | Low/None for direct P2P transactions | High (banks, processors, networks) |
| Primary Use Case | Secure P2P value transfer, Settlement | Retail payments, General commerce |
| Censorship Resistance | High | Lower (subject to intermediary/government policies) |
| Supply Mechanism | Fixed/Algorithmic (21 million BTC cap) | Elastic/Central Bank controlled |
This comparison shows that Bitcoin's base layer is built differently from systems designed for high-volume retail, aligning more with the needs of a secure system for transferring and settling significant value.
Bitcoin: The Digital Strongbox for Serious Value
What's a settlement network? It's a system that handles the final transfer of assets or money between parties, settling their debts to each other. In these networks, especially those dealing with large amounts, things like security, finality (knowing a done deal can't be undone), and resistance to outside meddling or censorship are super important. Think of central bank systems like Fedwire for big interbank dollar transfers, or how gold was historically used to settle international trade. These systems care more about certainty and irreversibility than the raw speed needed for buying a latte.
Bitcoin's Strengths as a Settlement Layer
Bitcoin has several features that make its base layer great for being a robust settlement network:
- Censorship Resistance: Because it's decentralized and no single entity controls it, Bitcoin transactions are very hard to block, freeze, or reverse by any one party, including governments or banks. This is huge for people in unstable political situations or for any transaction where you want to avoid potential meddling.
- Transaction Finality: Once a Bitcoin transaction is in a block and confirmed by enough subsequent blocks (usually 4-6 confirmations, taking about 40-60 minutes ), it's practically irreversible. This high degree of finality gives certainty to those receiving large transfers, which is vital for effective settlement.
- Great for Large Sums: A cool thing about Bitcoin transactions is that the network fee is usually based on the transaction's data size and network congestion, not the amount of money being sent. This means sending a very large sum of Bitcoin can be surprisingly cheap compared to traditional banking, which often charges percentage-based fees for big, especially international, transfers. Data shows Bitcoin is indeed used for high-value transfers, with an average transaction value much higher than retail payment networks.
- Permissionless Access: Anyone with an internet connection can join and use the Bitcoin network to send and receive value without needing anyone's approval. This is different from many traditional large-value settlement systems that are only for member institutions.
- Global and Borderless Operation: Bitcoin works 24/7, all over the world, without being tied to national borders or banking holidays. This makes it a flexible platform for international value settlement.
Transaction Features That Support Settlement
The very things about Bitcoin's transaction process that get criticized from a retail payment view actually become strengths for settlement:
- Confirmation Times: An average block time of 10 minutes, and needing multiple confirmations for strong finality (like ~40 minutes for 10 confirmations), might seem slow for buying coffee. But these times are perfectly fine, even good, for ensuring the security and irreversibility of high-value settlements. Certainty often beats speed in these cases.
- Transaction Fees: Bitcoin transaction fees are paid to miners to encourage them to include transactions in a block. When the network is busy, fees can go up. However, for large settlements, a transaction fee that's a tiny fraction of the total value being moved is often a fair price for the security, finality, and disintermediation Bitcoin offers. Users can also choose to pay higher fees for faster inclusion in a block and confirmation if they're in a hurry.
Bitcoin as a Foundation for Other Systems?
The idea of a settlement layer can also mean Bitcoin serves as a base for other layers or systems. These secondary systems might handle more, faster, cheaper transactions but could ultimately anchor their security and achieve final settlement on the super-secure and decentralized Bitcoin blockchain. While some argue other blockchains might be better for smart contracts as a global settlement layer, Bitcoin's unmatched security and decentralization make it a strong contender as the ultimate trust anchor for value.
In this light, Bitcoin's slowness and the cost of its Proof-of-Work security aren't bugs but essential features when you consider its role as a high-security settlement system. High-value settlements demand extreme security and practical irreversibility. Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work, the ~10-minute block interval, and the cumulative work of multiple confirmations are all designed to provide this level of security, making it incredibly difficult and economically foolish to try to reverse confirmed transactions. These features, which make it seem slow and costly for retail transactions, are necessary trade-offs for a system prioritizing robust, secure settlement. Judging Bitcoin's base layer by retail payment network standards is like comparing apples to oranges; its design is optimized for a different, and arguably more critical, set of priorities essential for a global, non-government settlement system.
The "Scaling" Debate: Does Bitcoin Really Need to Be Faster?
A major point of debate about Bitcoin's usefulness has been its transaction throughput. Bitcoin's base layer (Layer 1) can process about 3.3 to 7 transactions per second (TPS). This limit is mainly due to two things: the maximum size of each block (originally 1 megabyte, though effectively bigger with SegWit) and the average time to mine a new block (about 10 minutes).
Compared to global payment giants like Visa, which can reportedly handle thousands of TPS (around 2000 TPS worldwide at peak times ), Bitcoin's base layer capacity looks tiny. This difference has fueled the argument that Bitcoin can't scale to be a global payment system for everyday transactions.
The Counterargument: Current Capacity Fits Its Main Job
But what if Bitcoin's main job isn't to go head-to-head with Visa for every retail transaction, but to be a peer-to-peer system for moving significant value and a secure settlement network? If so, the demand for transaction volume on its base layer is different. The Bitcoin network already settles billions of dollars in value daily, but across far fewer transactions than retail networks. This leads to a much higher average transaction value (over $5,000 for Bitcoin versus around $80 for Visa), showing its current use is more like a large-value settlement network than a retail payments network.
The scalability problem is often framed by assuming Bitcoin must match Visa's TPS on its base layer to succeed. Yet, if its core value is being "digital gold" and a final settlement layer for transactions needing high security and censorship resistance, its current (or slightly improved) scale might be just right for this niche. High-value settlements are naturally less frequent than small retail payments. Gold, a traditional settlement asset, doesn't transact millions of times per second for small buys; its movements are more deliberate and usually involve larger sums. So, maybe the debate should shift from "how can Bitcoin match Visa's TPS?" to "is Bitcoin's current scalability enough for its role as a global, P2P, non-government settlement system?"
The Trade-offs: Decentralization and Security vs. Raw Speed
Layer 2 Solutions: The Best of Both Worlds?
It's also important to know about Layer 2 solutions, like the Lightning Network. The Lightning Network is a protocol built on top of Bitcoin that aims for faster, cheaper, and more numerous transactions by creating off-chain payment channels between users. These smaller, more frequent transactions can happen almost instantly with very low fees within the Lightning Network, with the final net settlement of these channels eventually recorded on the main Bitcoin blockchain.
These Layer 2 solutions can meet the demand for retail-like payment uses of Bitcoin without changing the fundamental properties or purpose of the Bitcoin base layer. This approach allows Bitcoin to potentially "have its cake and eat it too": keeping a highly secure, decentralized, and robust base layer optimized for final settlement of significant value, while also enabling faster and cheaper payments for smaller amounts on secondary layers for users who want those features. The existence and ongoing development of Layer 2 solutions reinforce the idea that the base layer itself doesn't necessarily need to scale to Visa-levels of TPS. Its primary role is to be the ultimate, secure foundation and settlement arbiter for the entire Bitcoin ecosystem.
What's Wrong With Old Money Anyway? (And How Bitcoin Helps)
Inflation: The Silent Thief of Your Savings
Financial Censorship: When Your Money Isn't Really Yours
The High Cost and Slow Pace of Traditional Finance
Certain parts of traditional finance can be expensive and slow, especially for cross-border transactions.
Sending Money Home (Remittances): Sending money internationally, especially small amounts to family, can come with hefty fees through traditional banks or money transfer services. Average fees can be 5% to 10% or even more, significantly reducing the value of the money sent. Banks are often the priciest, with average fees around 11.8% in late 2022. These high costs hit low-income migrants and their families hardest.
Middleman Costs and Delays: As the Bitcoin whitepaper noted , the layers of middlemen in traditional electronic payment systems add to overall transaction costs and can cause settlement delays.
How Bitcoin's Design Offers a Different Path
Bitcoin's core features offer potential solutions or alternatives:
- Fixed Supply: The capped supply directly counters the continuous money printing that can lead to inflation in fiat currencies.
- Decentralization & Censorship Resistance: The distributed nature of the Bitcoin network makes it extremely difficult for any single party to unilaterally block transactions or seize funds, as long as users securely manage their own private keys. This offers a defense against financial censorship.
- Peer-to-Peer Network: By enabling direct value transfer between users globally, Bitcoin can reduce reliance on multiple intermediaries, especially for cross-border transfers. This could potentially lower costs and speed up final settlement for value that doesn't need immediate conversion into local fiat.
These benefits aren't equally compelling everywhere. In countries with stable currencies, strong legal protections, low financial censorship, and efficient banking, Bitcoin's advantages might seem less urgent for daily needs. However, in regions with high inflation, strict capital controls, a high risk of financial deplatforming, or sky-high remittance fees, Bitcoin's core features of scarcity, censorship resistance, and P2P global transfer become very attractive. The problems Bitcoin is designed to solve aren't universally severe but are acute for many people globally. This reinforces Bitcoin's role as an alternative system, particularly suited for peer-to-peer value preservation and transfer, rather than as a blanket replacement for everyday local currency transactions in stable, well-functioning economies.
Here's a quick look at some key issues in traditional finance and how Bitcoin's attributes address them:
| Problem in Traditional Finance | Bitcoin (Base Layer) |
|---|---|
| Inflation / Purchasing Power Erosion | Fixed, Capped Supply (21 Million BTC) |
| Financial Censorship / Deplatforming | Decentralization, Censorship Resistance, Permissionless Access |
| High Remittance Costs / Intermediary Fees | Peer-to-Peer Network, Potential for Lower Fees for Direct Value Transfer |
| Lack of True Finality / Counterparty Risk | Transaction Irreversibility (after sufficient confirmations) |
| Reliance on Trusted Third Parties | Cryptographic Proof, Public Ledger, Disintermediation |
Is Bitcoin the New Gold? The "Digital Gold" Idea
You'll often hear Bitcoin called "digital gold." This comparison draws parallels between the cryptocurrency and the shiny metal based on shared traits, mainly scarcity and store of value. This analogy is pretty important for understanding Bitcoin's main use case and whether it's really "electronic cash" for everyday stuff.
The "Digital Gold" Analogy Explained
Both Bitcoin and gold are seen by many as stores of value, meaning they're expected to hold or increase their purchasing power over time. They're often sought as hedges against inflation, especially when traditional fiat currencies seem to be weakening due to loose monetary policies or too much money printing by central banks. Crucially, neither gold nor Bitcoin is controlled or issued by a single central authority like a government or central bank. Gold is natural and its supply is limited by how hard it is to mine, while Bitcoin's supply is capped by its code and its network runs on a decentralized blockchain, making it resistant to direct government or institutional meddling.
Bitcoin vs. Gold: A Closer Look
While the analogy is catchy, let's compare them side-by-side:
- Scarcity: Gold is naturally scarce; getting new supply takes a lot of effort and resources. Bitcoin has a mathematically enforced supply cap of 21 million coins, with new bitcoins created at a predictably slowing rate through "halving." This programmed scarcity is key to its "digital gold" story.
- Decentralization: Gold isn't issued or controlled by any single government. Bitcoin's network is decentralized, run by a global network of participants.
- Portability & Divisibility: Bitcoin is incredibly portable; huge sums can be sent digitally across the globe easily. It's also highly divisible, down to eight decimal places (a "satoshi"). Gold, while divisible, gets bulky and expensive to move and secure in large amounts.
- Durability: Gold is physically tough and doesn't rust. Bitcoin, as digital info secured on a strong and widely spread blockchain, is also very durable as long as the network keeps running and is secured.
- Verifiability: Checking the purity and amount of physical gold can take experts and special equipment. Bitcoin transactions are verified by the network using cryptography, and ownership is proven by controlling private keys.
- Historical Track Record: Gold has been a reliable store of value and medium of exchange for thousands of years, giving it a level of trust most other assets can't match. Bitcoin, born in 2009, is relatively new, and its long-term staying power as a store of value is still being proven.
- Volatility: Gold's price is generally considered pretty stable compared to Bitcoin, making it a favorite for more conservative investors looking to protect their capital. Bitcoin has historically had big price swings, which can mean high reward potential but also high risk.
- Uses Beyond Storing Value: Gold has various industrial and decorative uses (e.g., in electronics and jewelry), which add to its demand and perceived inherent value. Bitcoin's main utility is as a monetary asset – a medium of exchange (for some transactions), a unit of account (in its own world), and increasingly, a store of value. It doesn't have direct industrial uses but benefits from its role in the growing economy.
A Hedge Against Inflation and a Non-Government Asset
Many investors see both gold and Bitcoin as hedges against the falling value of fiat currency due to inflation. Historically, gold prices have often been swayed by inflation and real interest rates. When real yields on traditional "risk-free" assets fall (meaning the inflation-adjusted return is low or negative), non-yielding stores of value like gold and Bitcoin look relatively better.
A key shared feature is their status as non-sovereign assets. Their value isn't directly tied to the money policy of any single government, making them attractive for diversifying wealth away from state-controlled currencies. In recent years, central banks have been buying a lot of gold, partly due to efforts to move away from the dollar, worries about fiat currency debasement, and rising geopolitical tensions. Bitcoin aims to play a similar role as a non-sovereign store of value for individuals, institutions, and maybe even nations down the line.
What This Means for Bitcoin as "Cash"
If we primarily see Bitcoin as "digital gold", its function leans more towards preserving wealth, long-term investment, and settling large value transfers – much like physical gold is used. Gold isn't typically used for everyday small buys like groceries. Gold's role is more as a foundational monetary asset.
The "digital gold" narrative thus strengthens the argument that Bitcoin's main utility isn't as a high-speed medium of exchange for daily commerce. The very features that make Bitcoin like gold, such as its verifiable scarcity, decentralization, and non-sovereign nature, are those most valued in a long-term store of value and a system for settling large, peer-to-peer transactions where trust and finality are critical. Aspects where Bitcoin differs from an ideal daily payment currency, like its current base-layer transaction speed or its historical price swings, are less damaging to, and in some ways are byproducts of, its role as "digital gold." This framing aligns Bitcoin's technical design with its perceived main use case, making the "scalability problem" for retail payments less of a central issue if that's not its primary job.
Here’s a table comparing Bitcoin and gold on key characteristics relevant to their role as stores of value:
Characteristic | Bitcoin | Gold |
|---|---|---|
| Scarcity | Algorithmic, Fixed Cap (21 Million BTC) | Natural, Finite, Costly to Extract |
| Decentralization | Network-based, No Central Issuer | No Central Issuer, Geographically Dispersed |
| Historical Precedent | New (Since 2009) | Ancient (Millennia) |
| Volatility | Historically High | Relatively Low |
| Portability | Extremely High (Digital) | Moderate to Low (Physical, Costly in bulk) |
| Divisibility | Extremely High (to 8 decimal places) | High (can be physically divided) |
| Verifiability | Network/Cryptographic | Physical Assay, Requires Expertise |
| Storage | Digital (Self-custody, Third-party custodians) | Physical (Vaults, Self-storage), Paper Claims |
| Adoption | Growing, Tech-focused, Expanding Institutional Interest | Universal, Traditional, Central Bank Holdings |
| Primary Function | Emerging Store of Value, P2P Value Transfer System | Established Store of Value, Industrial/Ornamental Uses |
Finding Bitcoin's True Place in Your Financial World
So, what's the takeaway from all this? Bitcoin's foundational design and core features make it a unique player: a peer-to-peer electronic system for moving significant value and a robust settlement layer. The Bitcoin white paper aimed to create a system that sidesteps traditional financial middlemen, allowing direct, final transactions — features most vital when big money is involved or when censorship resistance is key. Bitcoin's architecture, with its decentralized proof-of-work, fixed supply, and transaction processing, fits the needs of a secure and resilient network for settling large sums globally, rather than trying to outpace retail payment networks in speed and volume. The "digital gold" comparison further highlights its suitability as a non-government store of value and a way to preserve and transfer wealth differently from traditional fiat currencies.
Bitcoin doesn't need to replace the U.S. dollar or other major currencies in all their roles, especially not as the go-to for everyday retail buys, to be a massive success and a valuable innovation. Its strength is in offering a distinct, non-sovereign, peer-to-peer monetary system that meets specific needs and solves particular problems that traditional finance either can't or won't handle effectively. This includes enabling censorship-resistant transactions, offering a potential inflation hedge for long-term savers, allowing more efficient large-value cross-border transfers, and providing a financial rail for people in underbanked regions or those facing financial exclusion.
Understanding Bitcoin's core principles, its design trade-offs, and the problems it was built to solve is crucial for accurately seeing its role and potential. Common criticisms that only focus on its limits as a retail payment system, like its base-layer transaction speed or short-term price swings, often miss the point by not recognizing its primary strengths and intended uses. Bitcoin's role in the evolving global financial world is more likely to be specialized and complementary to existing systems, rather than a direct, all-in-one replacement. It offers a powerful alternative for users and situations where its unique features of decentralization, security, finality, and scarcity are most prized. As the digital economy grows, Bitcoin's function as a peer-to-peer settlement network and a non-sovereign store of value is likely to become even more clear and important.
This content is developed from sources believed to be providing accurate information. The information in this material is not intended as investment, tax, or legal advice. It may not be used for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation. The opinions expressed and material provided are for general information, and should not be considered a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Digital assets and cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and could present an increased risk to an investors portfolio. The future of digital assets and cryptocurrencies is uncertain and highly speculative and should be considered only by investors willing and able to take on the risk and potentially endure substantial loss. Nothing in this content is to be considered advice to purchase or invest in digital assets or cryptocurrencies.
Enjoying Strateon Intelligent Wealth’s Insights?
Subscribe to Strateon Intelligent Wealth’s Weekly Insights Newsletter!
The weekly newsletter is usually delivered to your email inbox Friday or Saturday, and includes:
- a summary of the week's important news regarding the economy and markets
- recommended third-party reads
Strateon Intelligent Wealth does NOT sell subscriber information. Your name, email address, and phone number will be kept private.
